|
Post by indigorebel on Oct 27, 2015 19:44:47 GMT -5
Hal Keller here...
This is a coalition, not a faction. We are Survivors, Bandits, Rangers and Merhcnats who disagree with those who seek control over the tools of survival. We push our differences aside to set ourselves against a common foe. We unite to end all those who Monopolize the loot of an area by building over Prime locations. All one must do is report the locations of these oppertunists in this thread, those who seek justice will answer the call and bring chaos down on them.
Happy Hunting
|
|
swainoez
Steam ID Swainoez
Survivor
Posts: 55
|
Post by swainoez on Oct 27, 2015 22:49:49 GMT -5
Although I agree that building on POI can be seen as monopolising the location I still think it factors in what would happen if there was to be a zombie apocalypse. Long have a I imagined what I would do to a local walmart if I was able to get there unscathed in a zombie apocalypse, just think of the possibilities that you could have with a whole mall to play with (Dawn of the dead style). Saying that though the thing that usually kills the survivors is the undead horde. You not thought about joining the people who are taking over the locations? I hope you're not going to be offended by The Trashboats contributions in WP because if you are then you'll be meat for the grinder! I like your idea though, good luck with the group!!
|
|
|
Post by Dryke on Oct 28, 2015 8:00:14 GMT -5
Quite frankly this is ridiculous and amounts to nothing more than griefing people that try to do something positive. While I can understand the desire (and the need) to prevent someone from 'monopolizing' a POI, the overwhelming majority of constructions I have seen (and built myself) at such locations have been open to any living body that wanted in. Case in point: Fort Zippee has well over a dozen different ways for a survivor to safely enter and yet there are people that think it's fun to go sledge down the otherwise invulnerable fence and building sections (as well as the player built constructions) in order to let all of the zombies in. Making a safe place into a not safe place in the name of ending 'monopolization of loot' is about as short sighted as it gets. Feel free to do as you like but at least be honest about your intentions, and don't be surprised if you quickly find immense bounties offered to put an end to any group of griefers that actually take part in such actions. Because - while griefing is allowed, so are bounties
|
|
metaldevin
Blood Hounds
Posts: 121
Reputation:: Survivalist
|
Post by metaldevin on Oct 28, 2015 8:04:04 GMT -5
Im in a prime location downtown Wp. Pass by my window and ill let you know im home
|
|
|
Post by indigorebel on Oct 28, 2015 17:09:21 GMT -5
Quite frankly this is ridiculous and amounts to nothing more than griefing people that try to do something positive. While I can understand the desire (and the need) to prevent someone from 'monopolizing' a POI, the overwhelming majority of constructions I have seen (and built myself) at such locations have been open to any living body that wanted in. Case in point: Fort Zippee has well over a dozen different ways for a survivor to safely enter and yet there are people that think it's fun to go sledge down the otherwise invulnerable fence and building sections (as well as the player built constructions) in order to let all of the zombies in. Making a safe place into a not safe place in the name of ending 'monopolization of loot' is about as short sighted as it gets. Feel free to do as you like but at least be honest about your intentions, and don't be surprised if you quickly find immense bounties offered to put an end to any group of griefers that actually take part in such actions. Because - while griefing is allowed, so are bounties Im talking about players who camp over lets say The Gun Range. They have a elevated base impossible to reach by a new player. And the Gun Range is always empty because the asshat above comes down to clear out the store. If youre making a safezone for all I dont see then whyd you be our target. And in my book camping in a main looting spot and shooting new players looking for loot should be a form of griefing Also you cant argue itd be realistic for Urban Bases. Because building anywhere Urban in the Zombie apocalypse is fucking dangerous. Bases are always depicted in bumfuck egypt in the woods or in a compound far out away from the Urban zones. Usually in any media when An urban base is found its brought to ruin shortly after.
|
|
|
Post by indigorebel on Oct 28, 2015 17:16:04 GMT -5
Im in a prime location downtown Wp. Pass by my window and ill let you know im home Cool maybe Ill swing by and we can play Cards
|
|
Grumpy >:(
>:(
Blood Hounds
Posts: 209
AKA (in game): Grumpy >:(
AKA (in game): Azzmunch
AKA (in game): Murderin' Murphy
Reputation:: Law Enforcement
Group(s) In-Game:: BH
|
Post by Grumpy >:( on Oct 28, 2015 20:12:30 GMT -5
Hmmm, all of a sudden I'm feeling the urge to close the Westpoint Gun Store again Keep an ear to the wind for the announcement Hal.
|
|
John Titor
Anyone seen an IBM 5100?
Blood Hounds
Posts: 59
AKA (in game): John Titor
AKA (in game): Donnie Darko
AKA (in game): Christopher Hitchens
Reputation:: Builder
Group(s) In-Game:: Blood Hounds
Time Travelers
ODBM
|
Post by John Titor on Oct 28, 2015 22:10:17 GMT -5
T minus xx minutes until LOCKDOWN
|
|